洋淘网由商品页面挑出的重要提示
- 侦测到“故障品”字样，请与客服确认
- 此卖家为店铺，收10%消费税
- 此商品为海外发货，可能收取高额运费
- 此商品注意尺寸重量限制,以免无法运输
RXBLI23MI「Learning Together: A History of Coeducation in American Public Schools」ハードカバー 1990/10/24 英語版
RXBLI23MI「Learning Together: A History of Coeducation in American Public Schools」ハードカバー 1990/10/24 英語版[浏览Yahoo!拍卖页面]
- 一口价：￥41（合810日元）
- 现在价格：￥
日元） - 剩余时间：
- 下标数目：次
商品参数
- 拍卖号： t1095245985
开始时的价格：￥36 (701日元)
个数： 1
最高出价者： - 开始时间： 2024/10/20 20:30:51
结束时间：
提前结束： 有可能
商品成色： 二手 - 自动延长： 不会
日本邮费： 中标者承担
可否退货： 不可以
直购价格： ￥41 (810日元)
拍卖注意事项
1、【自动延长】：如果在结束前5分钟内有人出价，为了让其他竞拍者有时间思考，结束时间可延长5分钟。
2、【提前结束】：卖家觉得达到了心理价位，即使未到结束时间，也可以提前结束。
3、参考翻译由网络自动提供，仅供参考，不保证翻译内容的正确性。如有不明，请咨询客服。
4、本站为代购代拍平台，商品的品质和卖家的信誉需要您自己判断。请谨慎出价，竞价成功后订单将不能取消。
5、违反中国法律、无法邮寄的商品(注：象牙是违禁品，受《濒临绝种野生动植物国际贸易公约》保护)，本站不予代购。
6、邮政国际包裹禁运的危险品，邮政渠道不能发送到日本境外（详情请点击）, 如需发送到日本境外请自行联系渠道。
ｃ1990 Yale University Press (1990/10/24)
ハードカバー、英語
表紙カバー小傷。天と小口を中心に薄く経年ジミ。
本文良好です。
In this book the authors explore the factors that have shaped coeducation since its origins. The text is accompanied by contemporary photographs and photo-essays that add evidence about gender in classrooms. They address a number of provocative questions. Why did Americans choose to educate boys and girls together at the very time they were creating separate spheres for adult men and women? How did beliefs about the similarities and differences of boys and girls shape gender policies and practices in schools? Why did criticisms of coeducation often have little impact on everyday classroom practices? To what degree did the treatment of boys and girls differ by class, race, region, and historical period? Why did policymakers alternatively see girls or boys as the group "at risk"? The authors show that the history of coeducation is not a unified tale of pathology or progress. Schools have reflected some of the gender inequalitities embedded in the larger society, yet they have in some degree been sheltered enclaves where children and youth were treated in ways that contrasted sharply with the lives of adult women and men. Debates over gender policies suggest that Americans have made public education the repository of their hopes and anxieties about relationships between the sexes. Thus the history of coeducation serves as a window not only on constancy and change in gender practices in the schools but also on cultural conflicts about gender in the broader society.